A website for photographers, and nothing to fill in
Your feed is already the portfolio: the weddings, the portraits, the light you went out for. An AI reads the account and writes the site around it, sorted by category, with your packages, your about and one clear way to ask about a date. It costs you a minute instead of an evening with a template.
Photographers: what your site is made of
The work, split the way you shoot
Weddings, portraits, families, brand work: the AI reads the captions, sorts the account’s photographs into the categories you actually shoot, and gives one its own page when there is enough to fill it.
Packages, with starting prices
Coverage, hours, how many edited images, "from $2,400": whatever your captions and bio say goes on the page. If a number is not in your account the site shows no number, and you can dictate the packages in the chat.
An inquiry that asks the right things
Date, location, what the shoot is and how to reach them. The site can carry the form you already use or open WhatsApp with the message written. There is no booking calendar here: checking a date stays where it is today.
An about page in your voice
Who you are, where you work and how you work, written from your bio and the captions where you talk about yourself, then fixed in the chat until it sounds like you and not like a photographer’s website.
Reviews, only the ones you paste in
The AI will not invent a testimonial and cannot read your reviews from anywhere. Paste three real ones into the chat and it lays them out, with the client’s name when they agreed to it.
Why a link in the bio is not enough
- A template is still an evening of work and a monthly bill before a single client sees anything. This is about a minute, and publishing it is free.
- Instagram crops your frame, compresses it and buries last June. A site shows the series the way you edited it, at the address printed on your card.
- Clients ask the same three things before they write: what you charge, whether you have their date, and where you work. A page answers all three while you are shooting.
Questions
- Can clients see, choose and download their photos here?
- No, and it does not try. Delivery, proofing and selection stay in Pixieset, Pic-Time or Alboom, and your site links to them. What lives here is the public front: the portfolio, the packages, the about and the way somebody reaches you.
- Does this replace Squarespace or Showit?
- For the site, it competes on two things only: it is written in about a minute from the account you already keep, and publishing it costs nothing. They hand you a canvas and an evening. This hands you a finished site that you then talk to.
- Is it better than buying a photography website template?
- A template is a good website and an empty one. You still pick it, fill it, crop for it and pay for it before a client sees anything. Here the first draft is already your work, in a look chosen for your photographs, and you edit it by saying what is wrong with it.
- What should a wedding photographer’s website have?
- The work first, split by category, then packages with a starting price, an about with your face in it, real reviews, and one obvious way to ask about a date. Anything missing is one sentence in the chat: "add a weddings page with the full-day package".
- How many photos can I put on it?
- The AI reads the twelve most recent posts, which is enough for a first site and not enough for a portfolio. Upload the rest yourself: ten photographs on the free plan, a hundred on Pro. To swap any picture on the page, click it and choose another.
- How much does a photography website cost here?
- Publishing is free at yourname.instatoweb.com, with a small badge in the footer. Pro is $9 a month: your own domain, no badge, unlimited chat edits. Compare that with a template subscription plus the evening you spend filling it.